Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mary L. Johnson, Respondent, v. Charles S. Cole et al., Appellants; et al., Respondents, 1905 — 180 N.Y. 530 · caselaw · US
General
Mary L. Johnson, Respondent, v. Charles S. Cole et al., Appellants; et al., Respondents
180 N.Y. 530·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary L. Johnson, Respondent, v. Charles S. Cole et al., Appellants; et al., Respondents.
(Submitted January 9, 1905;
decided January 17, 1905.)
Motion to amend remittitur so as to provide that the judgment appealed from and the interlocutory judgment entered upon the report of the referee be reversed, with costs to the appellants in all the courts to abide the event. (See 178 H. Y. 364.)
[MAJORITY — Bartlett, J.]
Bartlett, J.
The motion should be denied, without costs. The opinion as originally written gave costs to the appellants in all the courts to abide the event. Prior to handing down the decision the opinion was amended by striking out the words “ to the appellants,” but owing to an oversight these words were not stricken from the copy of the opinion sent to the state reporter, and it was erroneously reported in 178 N. Y. 364, in its unamended form.
Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight, Yann and Werner, JJ., concur.
Motion denied.