Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sawyer v. Kochersperger, 1897 — 170 U.S. 303 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Sawyer v. Kochersperger
170 U.S. 30342 L. Ed. 1046·Supreme Court of the United States·1897
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sawyer v. Kochersperger.
Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Illinois.
No. 463.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice McKenna :]
Mr. Justice McKenna :
This was .a petition by Kochersperger, as county treasurer and collector of Cook County, Illinois, filed in the County Court of that county, against Elizabeth E. Sawyer and others seeking the collection of certain taxes. The case was removed into the Circuit Court of the United States, but improvidently, as it falls within the rule laid down in Tennessee v. Banks, 152 U. S. 454, notwithstanding the petition stated that defendants declined to pay on the ground thatithe law imposing-the taxes was in violation of the Constitution of the United States.
Decree reversed, and cause remanded to the Circuit Court vjith a direction to remand the case to the County Court of Cook County, the costs of this court and of the Circuit Court to be paid by plaintiffs in error.
These two cases' were argued with No. 464.