Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Valk v. United States, 1897 — 168 U.S. 703 · caselaw · US
General
Valk v. United States
168 U.S. 703·Supreme Court of the United States·1897
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 13.
Valk v. United States.
Appeal from’ the Court of Claims.
Submitted October 12, 1897.
Decided October 18, 1897.
Mr. John C. Chaney for appellant.
Mr. Attorney General ánd Mr. Assistant Attorney General Thompson for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam,.]
Per Curiam,.
Judgment affirmed on the authority of Marks v. United States, 161 U. S. 297, and Leighton v. United States, 161 U. S. 291.