Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William R. Seward, Trustee, etc., et al., Respondents, v. Burrall Spencer et al., Trustees, etc., Impleaded, etc., Appellants, 1883 — 94 N.Y. 639 · caselaw · US
General
William R. Seward, Trustee, etc., et al., Respondents, v. Burrall Spencer et al., Trustees, etc., Impleaded, etc., Appellants
94 N.Y. 639·New York Court of Appeals·1883·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William R. Seward, Trustee, etc., et al., Respondents, v. Burrall Spencer et al., Trustees, etc., Impleaded, etc., Appellants.
(Submitted December 3, 1883 ;
decided December 11, 1883.)
O. O. Cottle for appellants.
J. B. Perkins for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to reverse judgments of General and Special Terms. Judgment ordered for defendants, dismissing the complaint on opinion in Seward v. Huntington (ante, p. 104).
All concur.
Judgment accordingly.