General
Beeman et al. v. Michigan Board of Pharmacy et al.
338 U.S. 803·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 134.
Beeman et al. v. Michigan Board of Pharmacy et al.
Raymond K. Dykema for appellants. Stephen J. Roth, Attorney General of Michigan, Edmund E. Shepherd, Solicitor General, Ernest O. Zirkalos and Daniel J. O’Hara, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.