General
Scott v. Woodhams, et al.
79 Colo. 532·Colorado Supreme Court·1926·CO
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 11,570.
Scott v. Woodhams, et al.
Decided May 24, 1926.
On motion to dismiss writ of error.
Writ Dismissed.
1. Appeal and Error — Writ of Error — Dismissal. This case ruled hy the opinion in Scott v. Woodhams, 79 Colo. 528.
Error to the District Court of Sedgwich County, Hon. H. E. Munson, Judge.
Mr. H. N. Marshall, for plaintiff in error.
Messrs. Roleson & Hendricks, for defendants in error.
Department Two.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Chief Justice Allen]
Mr. Chief Justice Allen
delivered the opinion of the court.
Defendants in error W. H. Woodhams and Hattie Woodhams have filed a motion to dismiss the writ. The case is a companion case to No. 11,569, Scott v. Woodhams, et al., 79 Colo. 528, 246 Pac. 1027, differing from it only in the figures and the land involved. The questions raised, and argument made, are the same in each ease. For reasons stated in the opinion filed in cause No. 11,569, the motion is sustained, and the writ dismissed.
Mr. Justice Denison and Mr. Justice Whiteord concur.