General
North Carolina et al. v. United States et al.
350 U.S. 805·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 55.
North Carolina et al. v. United States et al.
Harry McMullan, Attorney General, and I. Beverly Lake, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of North Carolina, and R. Brookes Peters for the North Carolina State Highway and Public Works Commission, appellants. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Daniel M. Friedman and Edward M. Reidy for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and James B. McDonough, Jr., Charles P. Reynolds, Arthur J. Winder, William T. Joyner, Arthur J. Dixon and Henry J. Karison for the Aberdeen & Rock-fish Railroad Co. et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina.
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.