General
Felix M. Mendelson Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni v. United States
36 Cust. Ct. 491·United States Customs Court·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(V. D. 23)
Felix M. Mendelson Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni v. United States
Entry No. 616, etc.
(Decided March 9, 1956)
Lawrence & Tuttle for the plaintiffs.
Warren E. Burger, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
[MAJORITY — WilsoN, Judge:]
WilsoN, Judge:
The cases listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, involve valuation proceedings which arose by reason of judgments entered by this court in Felix M. Mendelson and Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni et al. v. United States, 31 Cust. Ct. 311, Abstract 57653; Thalson Co. and Joseph A. Paredes & Co. et al. v. United States, 33 Cust. Ct. 305, Abstract 58234; Felix M. Mendelson and Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni et al. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 313, Abstract 58859; and Frazar & Hansen, Ltd., et al. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 205, Abstract 59190. By those judgments, under the terms of the statute (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)), the matters were remanded to a single judge to “determine the proper dutiable value of the merchandise.” The proceedings have been abandoned by counsel for the plaintiffs. They are, therefore, dismissed.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.