Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Judicial Accounting of Druscilla Werry et al., Executors, etc. In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of Peter Werry, deceased, 1891 — 127 N.Y. 667 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Judicial Accounting of Druscilla Werry et al., Executors, etc. In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of Peter Werry, deceased
127 N.Y. 667·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Judicial Accounting of Druscilla Werry et al., Executors, etc. In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of Peter Werry, deceased.
(Argued April 21, 1891;
decided June 2, 1891.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the second judicial department, made December 8, 1890, which reversed two certain decrees of the surrogate of Orange county.
C. E. Bushmore for appellant. ,
William Vmiamee for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm ; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.