Administrative

Barney Zinick, Plaintiff, v. Lenox Hill Apartments, Inc., and Others, Defendants; Horace M. Biddle, Receiver, Appellant; Permanent Grate Engineering Co., Inc., Respondent

226 A.D. 809·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1929·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Barney Zinick, Plaintiff, v. Lenox Hill Apartments, Inc., and Others, Defendants. Horace M. Biddle, Receiver, Appellant; Permanent Grate Engineering Co., Inc., Respondent. [MAJORITY] Motion to restrain the Permanent Grate Engineering Co., Inc., its agents and any city marshal from interfering with or removing the property in question granted. We are of opinion that the Permanent Grate Engineering Co., Inc., should be permitted to intervene as a party to the foreclosure action upon its application. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young Kapper and Seeger, JJ.