Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mario PAOLOTTI and Robert Frederica, Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error, 1925 — 4 F.2d 1021 · caselaw · US
General
Mario PAOLOTTI and Robert Frederica, Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
4 F.2d 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1925
Before HOUGH and MAN-TON, Circuit Judges, and LEARNED HAND, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mario PAOLOTTI and Robert Frederica, Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
January 23, 1925.)
No. 215.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Moses A. Sacks, of New York City, for plaintiffs in error. William Hayward, U. S. Atty., of New York City (John M. Cashin, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.
Before HOUGH and MAN-TON, Circuit Judges, and LEARNED HAND, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment reversed in open court, and new trial granted.