Tax
Florence Haynes, Respondent, v. Service Taxicab Corp. and Manuel Hevia, Appellants, and Walter Lanigan and Margarite Lanigan, Respondents
261 A.D. 1097·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1941·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Florence Haynes, Respondent, v. Service Taxicab Corp. and Manuel Hevia, Appellants, and Walter Lanigan and Margarite Lanigan, Respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal, by permission, by two out of four defendants, in an action for damages for personal injuries, from an order of the Appellate Term (a) reversing an order of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, which set aside a verdict for plaintiff and granted a new trial, and (b) reinstating the verdict. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.