Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frank Wilson, as Surviving Executor, etc., Respondent, v. Henry R. Reynolds et al., Appellants, 1885 — 98 N.Y. 640 · caselaw · US
General
Frank Wilson, as Surviving Executor, etc., Respondent, v. Henry R. Reynolds et al., Appellants
98 N.Y. 640·New York Court of Appeals·1885·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank Wilson, as Surviving Executor, etc., Respondent, v. Henry R. Reynolds et al., Appellants.
(Argued February 6, 1885;
decided March 3, 1885.)
W. H. Sawyer for appellants.
Leslie W. Bussell for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on decisions in Pinney v. Orth (88 N. T. 447), Holcomb v. Holcomb (95 id. 325), and Lewis v. Merritt {ante, p. 206).
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.