Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Bowery Savings Bank v. Edward C. Richards, 1875 — 62 N.Y. 631 · caselaw · US
General
The Bowery Savings Bank v. Edward C. Richards
62 N.Y. 631·New York Court of Appeals·1875·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Bowery Savings Bank v. Edward C. Richards.
(Argued June 8, 1875;
decided June 15, 1875.)
This was an appeal from an order of General Term reversing two orders of Special Term, the one adjudging one Andrew B. Hine guilty of contempt in interfering with and prejudicing the rights of James M. Oakley, appointed receiver herein, and referring it to a referee to ascertain damages, the other imposing a fine, etc. Held, not appeal-able. (Batterman v. Finn, 40 F. Y., 340; Carrington v. Florida Railroad Company, 52 id., 583.)
William G. Wilson for the appellant.
Albert Smith for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Folger, J.,]
Folger, J.,
reads for dismissal of the appeal.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.