Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bartolemy J. Olifiers, Appellant, v. Perry Belmont and John A. Chanler, Respondents, Impleaded with Others, 1899 — 159 N.Y. 550 · caselaw · US
General
Bartolemy J. Olifiers, Appellant, v. Perry Belmont and John A. Chanler, Respondents, Impleaded with Others
159 N.Y. 550·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bartolemy J. Olifiers, Appellant, v. Perry Belmont and John A. Chanler, Respondents, Impleaded with Others.
Olifiers v. Belmont, 15 Misc. Rep. 120, affirmed.
(Submitted May 4,1899;
decided June 6, 1899.)
Appeal from final judgments of the late Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of New York, entered October 27 and December 9, 1896, upon orders of the General Term of that court, affirming interlocutory judgments in favor of each of the above respondents.
John Brooks Lernitt for appellant.
John M. Bowers, James W. Gerard, Jr., and Hctrry Van Hess Philip for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgments and orders affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Parker, Ch. J., not voting.