Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of Frank A. Hall, Respondent, for a Writ of Certiorari against The Assessors of the Town of Monroe, Appellants, Impleaded with Another, 1907 — 189 N.Y. 552 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of Frank A. Hall, Respondent, for a Writ of Certiorari against The Assessors of the Town of Monroe, Appellants, Impleaded with Another
189 N.Y. 552·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Frank A. Hall, Respondent, for a Writ of Certiorari against The Assessors of the Town of Monroe, Appellants, Impleaded with Another.
Matter of Kali v. Assessors Toion of Monroe, 116 App. Div. 739, affirmed.
(Argued October 3, 1907;
decided October 22, 1907.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 11, 1907, which reversed an order of Special Term confirming an assessment on property of the relator and dismissing a writ of certiorari to review the same and annulled such assessment.
M. N. Kane for ajipellants.
George It. Brewster for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight and Hiscock, JJ. Dissenting: O’Brien, Vann and Chase, JJ.