General
Twin Falls Canal Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Idaho et al.
235 U.S. 690·Supreme Court of the United States·1914
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 36.
Twin Falls Canal Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Idaho et al.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho.
Argued October 30 and November 2, 1914.
Decided November 9, 1914.
Mt. Arthur M. Bowen for the plaintiff in error. Mr. J. H. Peterson and Mr. Edwin G. Davis for the defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per
Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Yazoo & Miss. R. R. v. Brewer, 231 U. S. 245, 249; Holden Land Co. v. Interstate Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541.