General
Fannie Stambler, Appellant, v. Thomas J. Walsh, as Receiver of Samuel Caven, Respondent
219 A.D. 732·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1927·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Fannie Stambler, Appellant, v. Thomas J. Walsh, as Receiver of Samuel Caven, Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment of the County Court of Richmond county reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff, with costs. The presumption arising from the registration of this ear, pursuant to section 282 of the Highway Law, in the name of Samuel Caven (McCann v. Davison, 145 App. Div. 522; Ferris v. Sterling, 214 N. Y. 249; Bogorad v. Dix, 176 App. Div. 774) was overcome by the uneontradicted proof that plaintiff purchased this ear and was the owner of it at the time of the trial. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.
Added by Laws of 1910, chap. 374, as amd. by Laws of 1921, chap. 580; Laws of 1924, chap. 360, and Laws of 1925, chaps. 33, 64, 517; since amd.— [Rep.