Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Minnie Kilpatrick, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Choctaw, Oklahoma and Gulf Railroad Company, 1904 — 195 U.S. 624 · caselaw · US
General
Minnie Kilpatrick, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Choctaw, Oklahoma and Gulf Railroad Company
195 U.S. 624·Supreme Court of the United States·1904
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 30.
Minnie Kilpatrick, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Choctaw, Oklahoma and Gulf Railroad Company.
In error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Submitted October 28, 1904.
Decided October 31, 1904.
Mr. W. O. Davis for plaintiff in error.
Mr. J. W. McLoud for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs, on the authority of Southern Pacific Company v. Seley, 152 U. S. 145, and case remanded to the United States court for the Central District of the Indian Territory.