General
Eric Cruz, Respondent, v. Luciano P. Martins, Appellant, and Jessica Grocery et al., Respondents
35 A.D.3d 524824 N.Y.S.2d 747·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2006·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Eric Cruz, Respondent, v Luciano P. Martins, Appellant, and Jessica Grocery et al., Respondents.
[824 NYS2d 747]
[MAJORITY]
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Luciano E Martins appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), dated May 5, 2005, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against him.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff-respondent.
In support of his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against him, the defendant Luciano E Martins failed to demonstrate a prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alonso v Branchinelli, 277 AD2d 408 [2000]). Thus, the motion was properly denied regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851 [1985]). Miller, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Lunn, JJ., concur.