Securities
Maggie LaManna, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The National Security Life and Accident Company, Appellant
128 N.Y. 613·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Maggie LaManna, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The National Security Life and Accident Company, Appellant.
(Argued June 11, 1891;
decided June 25, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made May 12, 1890, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial
D. W. Northup for appellant.
William Allan for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Earl, J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.