Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
CALUMET GRAIN AND ELEVATOR COMPANY v. CHICAGO, 1903 — 188 U.S. 431 · caselaw · US
General
CALUMET GRAIN AND ELEVATOR COMPANY v. CHICAGO
188 U.S. 43147 L. Ed. 532·Supreme Court of the United States·1903
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CALUMET GRAIN AND ELEVATOR COMPANY v. CHICAGO.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 135.
Submitted December 19,1002.
Decided February 23, 1903.
Same counsel as in No. 136, see p. 410, ante.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice Harlan]
Mr. Justice Harlan
delivered the opinion of the court.
This case relates to the construction of a dock in Calumet River, on or in front of land belonging to the appellant. The facts upon which that company principally bases its claims for relief are those upon which the plaintiffs relied in Cummings v. Chicago, just decided. Upon the authority of the decision in that case, the judgment in this case is
Affirmed.