Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edward E. Conrad, Appellant, 1905 — 182 N.Y. 529 · caselaw · US
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edward E. Conrad, Appellant
182 N.Y. 529·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edward E. Conrad, Appellant.
(Argued June 5, 1905;
decided June 16, 1905.)
People v. Conrad, 102 App. Div. 566, affirmed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 13, 1905, which affirmed a judgment of the Court of General Sessions of the Peace in and for the county of New York, rendered upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of attempting to commit an abortion.
James W. Osborne, Howard Taylor and Otto T. Hess for appellant.
William Travers Jerome, District Attorney (Robert C. Taylor of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment of conviction affirmed ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen,■ Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Yann and ’Werner, JJ. Dissenting: O’Brien and Bartlett, JJ.