IP
In the Matter of the Application of Herman SCHLAICH
18 F.2d 1014·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia·1927
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Herman SCHLAICH.
Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.
Submitted January 14, 1927.
Decided March 7, 1927.
Patent Appeal No. 1914.
J. H. Milans and C. T. Milans, both of Washington, D. C., and E. Q. Moses, of New York City, for appellant.
T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.
[MAJORITY — ROBB, Associate Justice.]
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Appeal from a decision of the Patent Office, refusing to allow claims Nos. 20 to 24, inclusive, of appellant's appEeation; claims Nos. 1 to 19 having been aEowed.
This invention relates to an instrument for indicating temperatures in connection with internal combustion motors, and is closely related to the case just decided in Patent Appeal No. 1913. — App. D. C.-, 18 F.(2d) 1014. Here, as there, the Patent Office tribunals severally considered and rejected the claims involved. For the reasons set forth in our opinion in that ease, we affirm the decision in this.
Affirmed. *