General
G. L. Henderson et al. v. Helen R. Ressor, or Helen R. Henderson, et al.
248 U.S. 536·Supreme Court of the United States·1918
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 41.
G. L. Henderson et al. v. Helen R. Ressor, or Helen R. Henderson, et al.
Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri.
Argued November 14, 1918.
Decided November 18, 1918.
Mr. C. W. Prince, with whom Mr. Daniel V. Howell was on. the brief, for plaintiffs in error. Mr. H. M. Langworthy and Mr. T. A. Frank Jones, jfbr defendants in error, submitted.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216. (2) Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Melton, 218 U. S. 36, 51-52; Eastern Building & Loan Association v. Ebaugh, 185 U. S. 114; Pennsylvania Fire Insurance Co. v. Gold Issue Mining Co., 243 U. S. 93, 96; Texas & New Orleans R. R. Co. v. Miller, 221 U. S. 408, 416.