Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The County of Rensselaer, Respondent, v. The National Bank of Troy, Appellant, 1898 — 156 N.Y. 677 · caselaw · US
General
The County of Rensselaer, Respondent, v. The National Bank of Troy, Appellant
156 N.Y. 677·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The County of Rensselaer, Respondent, v. The National Bank of Troy, Appellant.
Oounty -of Bensselaer v. Nat. Bank of Troy, 27 App. Div. 631, appeal dismissed.
(Argued June 7, 1898;
decided June 7, 1898.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 24, 1898, affirming an order of a Trial Term requiring the defendant to make discovery and produce for inspection at Clinton Prison at Dannemora, N. Y., before a referee appointed to take the deposition of an alleged material witness for the plaintiff in the action before trial, in order to refresh the memory of the witness, certain books and papers specified in the order of the trial term.
Thomas S. Fagan for appellant.
L. E. Griffith and H. C. Ingalls for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed on argument, with costs.