Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hart et al. v. United States, 1940 — 311 U.S. 684 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Hart et al. v. United States
311 U.S. 684·Supreme Court of the United States·1940
Mr. Justice Murphy took no part in the consideration and decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 322.
Hart et al. v. United States.
October 21, 1940.
Messrs. Hugh M. Wilkinson, O. R. McGuire, and David V. Cahill for petitioners. Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attorney General Rogge, and Mr. Fred E. Strine for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
The motion for leave to file a supplemental petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is denied.
Mr. Justice Murphy took no part in the consideration and decision of these applications.