Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of Petition of Jan SIELIWONCZYK for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 1931 — 51 F.2d 1084 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of Petition of Jan SIELIWONCZYK for Writ of Habeas Corpus
51 F.2d 1084·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Petition of Jan SIELIWONCZYK for Writ of Habeas Corpus.
No. 5919.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
April 7, 1931.
Catherine G. Herlehy, of Detroit, Mich., for appellant.
Gregory II. Frederick, U. S. Atty., of Detroit, Mich., for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Docketed and dismissed by court order,, pursuant to motion of counsel for appellee.