Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Eighteen Packages of Dental Instruments, etc., Appellant and Plaintiff in Error, v. The United States, 1916 — 242 U.S. 617 · caselaw · US
General
Eighteen Packages of Dental Instruments, etc., Appellant and Plaintiff in Error, v. The United States
242 U.S. 617·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 586.
Eighteen Packages of Dental Instruments, etc., Appellant and Plaintiff in Error, v. The United States.
Appeal from and in error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Motion to dismiss submitted December 4, 1916.
Decided December 11, 1916.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of The United States v. Krall, 174 U. S. 385, 391; Macfarland v. Brown, 187 U. S. 239; United States v. Beatty, 232 U. S. 463, 466. Mr. John A. Kratz for the appellant and plaintiff in error. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for the appellee and defendant in error.