General
Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Joseph M. McCollum, Administrator of the Estate of Joseph William Roebuck
245 U.S. 632·Supreme Court of the United States·1917
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 57.
Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Joseph M. McCollum, Administrator of the Estate of Joseph William Roebuck.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana.
Submitted November 13, 1917.
Decided November 26, 1917.
Mr. Morison R. Waite and Mr. HUrvey J. Elam for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Merrill Moores for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Melton, 218 U. S. 36, 52, 53; Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U. S. 61, 78; Mutual Loan Co. v. Martell, 222 U. S. 225, 235; St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Ry. Co. v. Arkansas, 240 U. S. 518.