General

THE OWL DRUG COMPANY Appellant, v. JAMES G. BRYANT, as Director of Department of Employment, Respondent

36 Cal. 2d 880229 P.2d 357·Supreme Court of California·1951·CA

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

229 P.2d 357] [S. F. No. 18286. In Bank. Mar. 30, 1951.] THE OWL DRUG COMPANY Appellant, v. JAMES G. BRYANT, as Director of Department of Employment, Respondent. Adams, Duque, Davis and Hazeltine for Appellant. Fred N. Howser and Edmund G. Brown, Attorneys General, Charles W. Johnson and William L. Shaw, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent. [MAJORITY — THE COURT.] THE COURT. This appeal from a contempt judgment presents the same question as that involved in John Brenner Co. v. Bryant, ante, p. 877 [229 P.2d 356], decided this day, and on the authority of that ease it must be held that the judgment is not appealable. The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.