General
David W. Cramer, Respondent, v. Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut, and Another, Appellants
243 A.D. 679·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1935·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
David W. Cramer, Respondent, v. Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut, and Another, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur. (The judgment is for damages under a combination fire and liability insurance policy. The order denies a motion for a new trial on the minutes.)