Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Monroe F. Smith, Appellant, v. Robert Bowers et al., Respondents, 1902 — 171 N.Y. 669 · caselaw · US
General
Monroe F. Smith, Appellant, v. Robert Bowers et al., Respondents
171 N.Y. 669·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Monroe F. Smith, Appellant, v. Robert Bowers et al., Respondents.
Smith v. Bowers, 57 App. Div. 252, affirmed.
(Argued May 26, 1902;
decided June 10, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 15, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term.
Homer Weston for appellant.
Ceylon H. Lewis and Will B. Crowley for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.