General
The E. D. Chittenden Company, Respondent, v. Frank Romanasky and Annie Romanasky, His Wife, and Robert X. Kuzmier, Appellants
234 A.D. 877·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1931·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The E. D. Chittenden Company, Respondent, v. Frank Romanasky and Annie Romanasky, His Wife, and Robert X. Kuzmier, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Findings of fact numbered XV and XVII are reversed. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ.