General
F. W. Woolworth Co. v. United States
18 Cust. Ct. 330·United States Customs Court·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
F. W. Woolworth Co. v. United States
No. 6798.
Inyoice dated Nottingham, England, March 1945.
Certified March 1945.
Entered at New York, N. Y.; May 3, 1945.
Entry No. 730512.
(Decided January 23, 1947)
Sharretts & Hillis (Hadley S. King of counsel) for the plaintiff.
Paul P. Bao, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
[MAJORITY — Tilson, Judge]
Tilson, Judge
This appeal has been submitted for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that the issues herein are similar in all material respects to the issues involved in United States v. Pitcairn, C. A. D. 334, and the record in that case has been admitted in evidence herein.
Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, and following the cited authority, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by this appeal to be the values found by the appraiser, less any additions made by the importer on entry to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.