Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Anahma Realty Corp. v. Park-Lexington Corp., 1937 — 301 U.S. 685 · caselaw · US
General
Anahma Realty Corp. v. Park-Lexington Corp.
301 U.S. 685·Supreme Court of the United States·1937
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 819.
Anahma Realty Corp. v. Park-Lexington Corp.
April 12, 1937.
Mr. George F. Thompson for petitioner. Messrs. Pike P. Waldrop, Alexander Pfeiffer, Stuart McNamara, Charles Green Smith, Meyer Kraushaar, and Henry W. Taft for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.