Contracts · MBE-tested
Brownell, Attorney General, v. Rubinstein
346 U.S. 92998 L. Ed. 2d 421·Supreme Court of the United States·1954
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 300.
Brownell, Attorney General, v. Rubinstein.
Argued January 7-8, 1954.
Decided January 11, 1954.
Robert W. Ginnane argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and J. F. Bishop. Edward J. Ennis argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Jack Wasserman and Lemuel B. Schofield.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Certiorari, 346 U. S. 870, to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
Per Curiam:
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.