General
Carter, U. S. District Judge, et al. v. Olympic Refining Co. et al.
379 U.S. 900·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 395.
Carter, U. S. District Judge, et al. v. Olympic Refining Co. et al.
Francis R. Kirkham, William E. Mussman, Howard Painter, Jack E. Woods, George W. Jansen, Wayne H. Knight, Edmund D. Buckley, Irving Slifkin, Andrew A. Hauk and Harold C. Morton for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick and Robert B. Hummel for the United States, and Joseph L. Alioto for Olympic Refining Co., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.