Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of Walter B. Ellis, Appellant, v. The Buffalo, Lockport and Rochester Railway Company, Respondent, 1908 — 192 N.Y. 562 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of Walter B. Ellis, Appellant, v. The Buffalo, Lockport and Rochester Railway Company, Respondent
192 N.Y. 562·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Walter B. Ellis, Appellant, v. The Buffalo, Lockport and Rochester Railway Company, Respondent.
Matter of Ellis v. Buffalo, L. & R. Ry. Co., 125 App. Div. 111, 904, affirmed.
(Argued May 20, 1908;
decided May 26, 1908.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 4, 1908, which reversed an order of Special Term granting an application for an order directing the respondent herein to erect and maintain a crossing under its tracks and dismissed the petition.
George F. Thompson for appellant.
Charles B. Hill and Charles G. Signor for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.