Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
LACAL OIL COMPANY, Ltd., Appellant, v. D. C. GRAHAM, as Trustee, and Richfield Cons. Oil Co., Appellees, 1934 — 72 F.2d 1014 · caselaw · US
General
LACAL OIL COMPANY, Ltd., Appellant, v. D. C. GRAHAM, as Trustee, and Richfield Cons. Oil Co., Appellees
72 F.2d 1014·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LACAL OIL COMPANY, Ltd., Appellant, v. D. C. GRAHAM, as Trustee, and Richfield Cons. Oil Co., Appellees.
No. 7374.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 9, 1934.
Bernard L. Herlihy and Oliver 0. Clark, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
- Raphael Deehter, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee Graham.
Hazlett & Plummer, of Los Angeles, Gal., for appellee Richfield Oil Co.
Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and GARRECHT, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon motion of appellees to dismiss appeal and good cause appearing, ordered appeal dismissed for failure of appellant to file brief within time required by rule 24 of the Rules of Practice of this court.