General
Thomas D. Hurst, Respondent, v. Trow's Printing and Bookbinding Company et al., Appellants
142 N.Y. 637·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas D. Hurst, Respondent, v. Trow’s Printing and Bookbinding Company et al., Appellants.
(Argued March 16, 1894;
decided April 10, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of Hew York, entered upon an order made February 6,1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court, and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Frederic F. Kellogg for appellants.
And/rew Oilhoohy, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.,