Torts · MBE-tested
Mary Masterson, Respondent, v. Crosstown Street Railway Company of Buffalo and International Railway Company, Appellants
136 A.D. 908·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1909·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary Masterson, Respondent, v. Crosstown Street Railway Company of Buffalo and International Railway Company, Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented, upon the ground that the evidence fails to establish actionable negligence on the part of the defendants and plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence. Spring, J., not sitting.