Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John H. Usher, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant, 1904 — 179 N.Y. 544 · caselaw · US
General
John H. Usher, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant
179 N.Y. 544·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John H. Usher, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.
Usher v. N. T. G. & H. B. B. B. Go., 76 App. Div. 422, affirmed.
(Argued June 7, 1904;
decided August 5, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 19,1903, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a .verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Thomas Emery, Robert A. Kutsehbodk and Herbert E. Kinney for appellant.
Arthur 8. Tompkins for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Bartlett, Martin, Yann and Werner, JJ. Dissenting: Parker, Ch. J., and Cullen, J. Absent: Haight, J.