General
In the Matter of the Claim of Dorothy Kathleen Murphy, Respondent, against Mary Immaculate Hospital and The Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Company, Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent
263 A.D. 768·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1941·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Claim of Dorothy Kathleen Murphy, Respondent, against Mary Immaculate Hospital and The Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Company, Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal by employer and insurance carrier from an award made by the State Industrial Board in favor of claimant, who was employed as a student nurse by the employer hospital. There is ample evidence to support the finding of the Board that the claim was not barred under the provisions of section 28 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The award should be affirmed. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Schenck and Foster, JJ.