General
Shiffman v. Selective Service Local Board No. 5 et al.
391 U.S. 930·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
(See concurring memorandum of Mr. Justice Stewart and dissent of Mr. Justice Douglas below.)
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
May 27, 1968.
No. -.
Shiffman v. Selective Service Local Board No. 5 et al.
Melvin L. Wulf for applicant.
Solicitor General Griswold for respondents in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Application for writ of injunction or stay, presented to Mr. Justice Harlan, and by him referred to the Court, denied.
(See concurring memorandum of Mr. Justice Stewart and dissent of Mr. Justice Douglas below.)