General

Kalilon Taal et al., Appellants, v. Robert A. Krobatsch, Respondent

281 A.D.2d 621722 N.Y.S.2d 186·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2001·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Kalilon Taal et al., Appellants, v Robert A. Krobatsch, Respondent. [722 NYS2d 186] [MAJORITY] —In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), entered January 6, 2000, which, upon a jury verdict, and upon the denial of their motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside the verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against them dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. The trial court properly denied the plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside the verdict, as the jury verdict in favor of the defendant could have been reached on a fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 134). Altman, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.