Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frederick J. Stubing, Respondent, v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Appellant, 1894 — 143 N.Y. 681 · caselaw · US
General
Frederick J. Stubing, Respondent, v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Appellant
143 N.Y. 681·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frederick J. Stubing, Respondent, v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Appellant.
(Argued October 22, 1894;
decided November 27, 1894.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made May 18, 1894, which affirhied an order of Special Term denying a motion by defendant to set aside the service of the summons herein.
William L. Learned for appellant.
Da/oid Swits for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur except Andbews, Ch. J., and Gbay, J., not voting.
Order affirmed.