Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sanks et al. v. Georgia et al., 1969 — 395 U.S. 974 · caselaw · US
General
Sanks et al. v. Georgia et al.
395 U.S. 974·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1977,
Misc.
Sanks et al. v. Georgia et al.
Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Alfred L. Evans, Jr., and A. Joseph Nardone, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee State of Georgia.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ga. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Probable jurisdiction noted. Case transferred to appellate docket and set for oral argument immediately following No. 1232 [Simmons v. West Haven Housing Authority, 394 U. S. 957].