Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John T. Farley, Appellant, v. Frederick S. Howard, Respondent, 1902 — 172 N.Y. 628 · caselaw · US
General
John T. Farley, Appellant, v. Frederick S. Howard, Respondent
172 N.Y. 628·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John T. Farley, Appellant, v. Frederick S. Howard, Respondent.
Farley v. Howard, 60 App. Div. 193, affirmed.
(Submitted October 17, 1902;
decided October 31, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 11,1901, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term without a jury.
Robert L. Redfield for appellant.
Cha/rles M. Cemnon and Wilfrid N. O'Neil for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinions of Rbmsey, J., and Van Brunt, P. J., below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Cullen and Werner, JJ.