Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. et al. v. United States ; and Societe Internationale Forestiere et Miniere du Congo et al. v. United States, 1945 — 324 U.S. 839 · caselaw · US
General
De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. et al. v. United States ; and Societe Internationale Forestiere et Miniere du Congo et al. v. United States
324 U.S. 839·Supreme Court of the United States·1945
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1189.
No. 1190.
De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. et al. v. United States ; and Societe Internationale Forestiere et Miniere du Congo et al. v. United States.
April 23, 1945.
Messrs. Robert T. Swaine and Wm. Dwight Whitney for petitioners in No. 1189.
Mr. John M. Harlan for petitioners in No. 1190.
Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, Messrs. Charles H. Weston, Herbert A. Berman and Ediuard S. Stimson for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York granted.